This proverb has always
been intriguing. Years ago, a friend related a story of a gate in the
wall around ancient Jerusalem called the "Eye of the Needle," or the
"Needle's Eye." This gate was designed in such a way that it could be
used by pedestrians but not by marauding bandits on their camels. The
only way a camel could get through this "Eye of the Needle" was to be
unloaded and crawl through on its knees. This great story—and several
variations of it—have made the rounds over the years.
The spiritual analogies were clear. The camel
could go through the "Eye of the Needle," but only after being stripped of its baggage—its wealth!
The
only problem with this story is that it is not true! There is
absolutely no archaeological or historical evidence for the existence of
such a gate. The story was first told several centuries ago and has
been repeated ever since. It is yet another example of people trying to
make Christ's words fit their own concepts of what He meant.
Jesus
clearly says that it would be easier for a camel to go through the eye
of a needle. Can this be done? Of course not! That is the point! Yet,
people have tried in vain to make it happen. Some have suggested that
there is a misprint in the Greek. The Greek word
kamelos, meaning "camel"
should really be
kamilos,
meaning "cable" or "rope." Still, passing a rope through a needle's eye
is nevertheless impossible. Ah, but what if one uses a six-inch carpet
needle, and the rope is actually made of camel's hair? Others have
suggested that this was an Aramaic pun on the word for a camel and that
of a gnat or louse, from the Aramaic
kalma meaning "vermin" or "louse." It can become quite ridiculous.
All
this maneuvering is unnecessary. Christ was using hyperbole, just as He
did when He spoke of a plank being in one's eye while attempting to
remove the splinter in a brother's eye (Matthew 7:3-4). Everyone seems
to understand that this is exaggeration for effect; commentators do not
claim, "Well, He really meant a toothpick, not a 2 x 4." In our own
speech, we use hyperbole all the time, such as, "This book weighs a
ton," or "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse."
Jesus' hyperbole in
Matthew 19:24 is easily explained. The camel was the largest animal
regularly seen in Israel, and its contrast with the small size of a
needle's eye shows the utter impossibility of the effort to squeeze the
former through the latter. In Babylon, where portions of the Jewish
Talmud were written, since the elephant was the largest animal, it was
substituted for "camel" in this common aphorism.
Why do so many
want to act as apologists for what Christ "really" meant in Matthew 19?
Is it because we secretly—or even openly—desire wealth and do not want
any biblical negativity slowing us down? Just in case we inherit big
bucks from the uncle we forgot we had, we would not want any spiritual
stigma attached to the money! To reiterate, the wealth itself is not the
problem, but our attachment to it or what it can buy.
Jesus'
disciples were horrified at His words. "Who then can be saved?" they
wondered. It is very simple. Christ is instructing them that, through
his own efforts,
no one can be saved. He does not mean just the wealthy cannot be saved, but
no one can be saved through his money, his skills, his talents, his intellect, or his good looks!
During
the time of Christ, the Jews believed that wealth and prosperity were a
sign of God's blessing, so the reaction of His disciples is sheer
incredulity. Later, professing Christians fell into the opposite ditch
by portraying riches as a hindrance to salvation—which they can be—but
so can many other things.
What if we are considered to be poor by
this world? Are we somehow better than those with more physical goods?
It would be just as dangerous for an underprivileged person to think
that he had it made—that his poverty gave him some sort of piety—as it
would for a rich man to trust in his wealth. We can be tempted from the
path of righteousness by just about anything. Our downfall might be
drink, food, television, or any number of things available to us in this
world.
It is easy for us to look at the wealthy and judge them
to be unfit for God's Kingdom, congratulating ourselves in the process
for not having that particular distraction in our lives. While the rich
young ruler walked away from Christ, extremely sad that he could not
make that leap of faith, what in our own lives has the same hold on us?
What is the anchor that keeps our spiritual ship from sailing?
In
II Timothy 4:10, Paul writes, "Demas has forsaken me, having loved this
present world." What caused Demas to leave Paul and Christ? Demas loved
the world; the particulars are not divulged. Whatever it was is of less
import than the simple, spiritual fact that a camel cannot go through
the eye of a needle. Someone who loves the world, whether rich or poor,
will not be in God's Kingdom (James 4:4; I John 2:15-17).
The
point is that we do not achieve salvation through our own efforts; it is
from God alone, by His grace. "With men this is impossible, but with
God all things are possible," Jesus assures us. We have our part to play
and are rewarded for our efforts, as Romans 2 explains, but when God
takes us from this world, works with us, blesses us, and brings us into
His Family, it is truly a miracle.